![]() |
| Dr Constance Chan with a graph that shows possible uptick |
Apparently the number of coronavirus cases are on the rise and the Hong Kong government is mulling whether to make testing mandatory.
Yes, mandatory.
![]() |
| China Secret bar so far has 10 cases in cluster |
This afternoon the Director of Health Dr Constance Chan Hon-yee made an appearance at the regular 4.30pm press conference where 18 new cases were reported.
She described the current situation as "worrying" and pulled out a chart with projections made by the University of Hong Kong. It shows the reproduction rate of infected cases, known as the R value, has increased from below one to just above one. This means one infected person is potentially passing the virus to another person.
There were 35 new cases this week, quadruple the number last week of eight, while untraceable infections rose from three to 12 in a week, a two-month high.
![]() |
| Chan looking into legality of mandatory testing |
At the same time Chan wants to speak to those in the hotel industry in a bid to stop large gatherings in hotel rooms for "staycations".
While there are a few birthday parties here and there, most are couples or families trying to have a mini break for the weekend. The number of people in the room should be limited, but how can the hotel reinforce this rule? It's very difficult.
There also haven't been any cases stemming from these hotel parties... yet.
But back to mandatory testing... Secretary for Health Sophia Chan said earlier today it would soon be "necessary" to protect public health.
She even added the government is looking into the legalities of forcing people to take tests.
![]() |
| Who is going to pay for the test this time? |
"If there is a mandatory measure to require people to participate in the tests, we will have a better grasp of the relevant data for us to roll out effective measures. Therefore, this compulsory measure is necessary.
"We understand some people may have concerns about this. We are still studying the legality of mandatory testing to address their concerns, and the legal framework about this measure."
While this possibility is mildly alarming as most people are wearing masks and social distancing, even more worrying is who is going to pay for mandatory testing this time? And how much will it cost?




No comments:
Post a Comment