 |
| Leung Chun-yan (far right) left her bag at the check-in counter two yeras ago |
Can I jog your memory?
Back in March 2016, then chief executive Leung Chun-ying's daughter, Leung Chun-yan was catching a flight to the United States when she left her bag at the airport check-in counter and only realized it after she had passed through immigration and security.
What did she do? She called daddy to fix the problem. He called Cathay Pacific and demanded that they take the bag through security and pass it to his daughter who was already at the gate. He claimed there was a courtesy service that helped passengers with their left-behind bags.
 |
| Leung Chun-ying claims today's ruling is "political" |
The airline staff tried to explain the rules to him, that it was the passenger's responsibility because they should be present when the bag is undergoing security screening.
Meanwhile, the Airport Authority felt it was the airline's responsibility to take the bag through, while the Aviation Security Company (AVESCO) said it had no objection to the airline taking the bag, contravening the airport's own security rules.
The Hong Kong Aviation Security Programme (HKASP) rule at the time was: "All screening of cabin baggage shall be conducted in the presence of the passenger."
In the end a CX staff member did take the bag through security screening and gave it to Leung Chun-yan just before her flight took off.
Following the incident, airport security changed the rules, saying that only suspicious bags that needed to be screened a second time required the presence of the passenger, thus trying to make the Leung Chun-yan incident end.
However, flight attendant Law Mei-mei filed for a judicial review, as she was concerned whether a flight attendant should be allowed or required to take unattended baggage through security screening.
 |
| Passengers must be present when their bags are being checked |
And today the judge ruled airport bosses broke their own safety rules in the baggage fiasco two years ago.
Justice Anderson Chow Ka-ming declared decisions made by the Airport Authority and AVESCO contravened HKASP in force at the time. He concluded the government had later amended the security rules specifically to address the Leung case.
Chow also rejected Leung's argument that the airlines had a courtesy delivery service.
In a comment to Chinese media, Leung said the judgment was a "political act rather than a safety issue" but did not elaborate.
Hong Kong Cabin Crew Federation spokeswoman Carol Ng Man-yee said her group, an umbrella organization that includes Law's flight attendants' union -- was "very pleased" with the court ruling and demanded the Airport Authority and Civil Aviation Department apologize for going against their safety-first principle in the 2016 incident.
 |
| Carol Ng (second left) was very pleased with the ruling |
"What would I tell Leung Chun-ying and his wife? I'd tell everyone the same thing: it's everyone's obligation to follow the rules," Ng said outside the court.
Ng is now calling for the reinstatement of the original rules for safety reasons.
The Airport Authority respected the ruling, but stopped short of saying it would appeal, as the rules were already amended.
Finally vindication that everyone -- that means everyone -- must follow the rules when going through airport security.
The fact that Leung still insists he is right, and that the ruling is a political one just reveals how he and his family still believe these airport safety rules do not apply to them at all.
It also shows how the Aviation Authority and AVESCO bowed to Leung's demands, throwing security concerns out the window.
Can we please have more back bone in Hong Kong? Or is this a sign of things to come?