![]() |
| Lam answered questions in the Legislative Council today |
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam fought back at criticisms of the newly overhauled election system, in particular one former opposition leader and lawmaker for "not understanding democracy".
At a question and answer period in the Legislative Council today, Lam was referring to former Democratic Party chairwoman Emily Lau Wai-hing, who felt the requirement for pan-democratic candidates to get approval from essentially their political rivals was "humiliating".
The city's leader did not name Lau by name, only saying for "a veteran political party member and former lawmaker" to call the process humiliating was "completely wrong".
![]() |
| Lam out on the hustings back in 2017 |
"Although more than 300 members [of the Election Committee] openly said they would not nominate me, I still explained my vision to them in a humble manner... I never felt humiliated, even though it was not a pleasant experience, as some reprimanded me for an hour before allowing me to speak," she said.
Wonder who chastised Lam for an hour?
But Lau says Lam citing her campaign experience is like "comparing apples and oranges" with the new rules to run for the Legislative Council. And Lau also questioned whether Lam had Beijing's definition of "democracy" in mind when she launched her attack.
"I don't really bother to understand so-called democracy with Chinese characteristics. What I'm looking at is the international standard," Lau said. "What's for sure is that obstacles for running are much higher with the new composition of the revamped Election Committee."
![]() |
| Lau says Lam is comparing apples and oranges |
This revamped Election Committee acts as the gatekeeper to decide who gets to run for the Legislative Council, thus making it near impossible for pan-democrats to get approval.
Lam also said her administration, including overseas offices, would continue to criticize reports they regarded as wrong by foreign media outlets.
"We feel angry about the biased reporting of the foreign press. Some overseas governments have also smeared what the Hong Kong and Chinese governments have done," she said.
The Chief Executive insisted the electoral changes were to improve governance, not stifle dissent.
"What happened in the past caused trauma among some colleagues... If [proposals they were in charge of] had to be scrutinized in Legco, their passion was reduced because they knew they might face smears or personal attacks," she said, pointing to the opposition's strong criticisms and use of filibustering tactics. "Luckily the central government acted swiftly. Otherwise, the damage would have been bigger."
![]() |
| Lam's cabinet rebukes criticism of foreign press |
So instead Beijing changed the rules, in effect shifted the goal posts to ensure big wins, in other words no opposition.
And with the number of directly-elected seats slashed from 35 to 20, the public will have fewer ways to voice their concerns to the government.
So how can Lam say the new electoral system is "democratic"? Perhaps she really means the opposite of what she says...













