Saturday, 5 May 2012

The Maestro and the Protege

Isaac Stern in Beijing in 1979
Tonight the Asia Society organized an interesting event where it screened the 1980 Oscar-winning documentary From Mao to Mozart: Isaac Stern in China.

It followed American violinist Stern who visited China for the first time in 1979 and was invited there by the Chinese government. The country was just coming out of the Cultural Revolution and the people were starving for western music.

What was originally supposed to be one recital turned out into more than one formal performance and numerous masterclasses with young Chinese musicians.

He was impressed by their hard work ethic, determination and skill, but they just seemed to play the notes on the page.

By playing on the violin to the students he was able to demonstrate that music is not about imitation or technique, but feeling the music and expressing it through the instrument.

He instructs a girl to sing then to play on the violin
He asked one girl to sing the first few bars of music for him, and at first embarrassed, she does it for him and he then instructs her to play like she sang. Stern said it was about getting the brain and the body to work together to create the music.

In another instance he explained that music was like all the colours we see as well as the ones we cannot see; he also said that every note in the music is intentional, and so when you play, you must make a statement with the music, otherwise what is the point?

This documentary perfectly captured the cultural awakening of the country as he profoundly touched the lives of these young musicians and their teachers -- he encouraged them to express themselves individually -- not as a group, or the same. This was probably a very difficult concept for them to understand, but only then could they really play music.

Another aspect of the film was seeing China over 30 years ago. There were lots of shots of people riding bicycles along Chang'an Avenue in Beijing, farmers walking barefoot as they carried heaps of straw on their shoulders, donkeys pulling carts, people wearing plain Mao suits.

How the country has changed so much in three decades. It was quite amazing to see the the difference.

We also saw how people the audience were constantly fanning themselves; there was no air conditioning to speak of, and perhaps the odd fan blowing hot air around the room.

There was also a sad interview with Tan Shuzhen of the Shanghai Conservatory, who talked about his experiences in the Cultural Revolution. He recalled having to live in a small closet below the stairs with no windows or fresh air and below him was the septic tank where all the toilet waste flowed into. He was only allowed out a few minutes each day and he lived like this for 14 months.

Wang Jian at aged 10
He said some 10 teachers committed suicide because they could not stand the humiliation of being treated like criminals when their crime was having the knowledge of western music.

Nevertheless, towards the end of the movie, there's a scene where Stern and his family visit the conservatory and watch a 10-year-old boy -- who looks more like a seven-year-old -- play the cello.

He is playing intently with feeling, each note resonating with the maestro.

This is Wang Jian, who has since become a famous cellist.

I saw him perform in Beijing in 2008 and wrote about it here.

After viewing the documentary, Wang came up on stage and talked about his life.

He began playing the cello at the age of four, as his father was a cellist. Because his father played well, he was chosen to go to Shanghai to perform for an opera company and the younger Wang joined him at the age of three. His parents were originally from Xian.

"My father gave me a viola and that to me was a cello," he explained with a smile. "Then I used a chopstick as a bow."

"My father wanted me to hear Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, but at the time of the Cultural Revolution, all the recordings were locked away in the library," he said. "So my father said to the Red Guards that he wanted to write a criticism denouncing Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, but needed to do research on it. So he was allowed to get access to it and that's how I first heard this recording."

His father taught him many life lessons at a young age.

"When I was young I worked very hard," Wang recalled. "My father said if you learn an instrument then you will avoid being sent down to the countryside. So I practiced very hard.

"He also said, 'I have nothing to give to you. I only know how to play the cello.' One time he took me to see a movie about a young child begging in the streets of Shanghai and said that if I didn't learn how to play cello well then I would be like that child begging on the street. So I practiced very hard."

When Stern came to the Shanghai Conservatory, no one knew who he was, not even the teachers. Wang explains that at that time, China was more focused on learning from Russian musicians. So to have an American musician come see them was unusual, though he was told Stern was invited by the Culture Ministry so he must be of some importance.

Wang wiping off his 1622 cello, a gift from the Lam family
At the time Wang has just studied one year at the conservatory which was very difficult to get into. So many children applied that he recalled, "If you didn't have perfect pitch, it didn't matter if you played well, you were not allowed in."

Not knowing who Stern was, Wang didn't focus too much attention on practicing for the maestro, even remembering that he played soccer just before playing for him.

Wang explained that he was always chosen to play for important people who visited the conservatory, so he thought this would be another routine thing.

"But I soon realized how serious this was because there were so many people, so many cameras and lights," he recalled. He mostly remembered Stern's bright orange shirt and "his face was really red."

Wang said at first they didn't film him and then Stern got up and got all angry and soon "they stuck a camera up my nose and they told me to continue playing."

He says for a long time he could not watch the film as he didn't remember himself like that. "He's a little awkward," Wang says of himself. "But then after I saw him as a cute boy." It was this distance that helped Wang see how much he had matured.

"Isaac Stern was very special," he said. "He was very intrusive. If he cared about something you could not run away from him. If he hears a young musician who has 'it', he can't control himself. He was the godfather of music in every sense of the word."

After Stern went back to the United States, he wrote letters to Wang, asking him how he was and even sent him a bow because his had broken.

A Hong Kong-born Chinese-American businessman Lam Sau-wing saw the documentary and was touched by the young boy.

Lam wrote to the Culture Ministry asking if he could sponsor Wang to study in the US. But because he was 12 at the time, he was considered too young. But four years later Lam tried again and succeeded. He promised Wang's parents he would treat the young boy as his own son and gave him a very expensive cello -- more dear that Yo-Yo Ma's instrument.

Wang talking to fans after his mini recital
Wang's cello dates back to 1622 and is from Lam's collection of musical instruments. From there Wang was able to go to the Yale School of Music with Stern's son and periodically the maestro gave him lessons.

It's been an incredible journey for Wang, who is forever indebted to Stern for his endless encouragement.

When asked what he thinks about young musicians today, if they are focused more on technique than playing with their heart, Wang observes that musicians are the product of society and today's society is more comfortable.

"Masterpieces were written in hard times. Maybe people like entertainment than pure art," he said, adding that most classical music was linked to religion which encouraged followers to think of a higher calling.

Wang did agree to a certain extent that many young Asian musicians he sees are technically proficient, but do they really love music? That's another thing altogether.

He definitely sees himself as a pure artist, as he jokingly says he has no clue how to become more commercial.

Just as well -- we need more artists to steer us back to important values, even as simple as music.




Friday, 4 May 2012

A Temporary Victory

We are pleased to see Chen Guangcheng is starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel -- China has allowed him to accept a fellowship at an American university and his family will be able to accompany him.

It is expected he will study at New York University, where his friend Jerome Cohen is a professor. In the last few days Cohen has been vital in representing Chen's interests in the negotiations between the United States and China.

As a side note, I met Cohen briefly in Beijing two years ago where I wrote about him here and here; having gotten to know Zhou Enlai in the early 1970s and worked in Beijing for a few years, Cohen has a very intimate and comprehensive knowledge of the country not only legally but historically too.

He has been following Chen's situation for seven years and even in his early 80s is not giving up the fight to help those who need legal representation wherever they are.

Cohen must be relieved Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin released a statement saying if Chen wanted to study abroad, as more than 300,000 Chinese students do, then he "can apply through normal channels to the relevant departments in accordance with the law, just like any other Chinese citizen."

At a news briefing today, Liu was certain that "competent Chinese authorities will handle his application in accordance with the law."

Fulfilling Chen's wish to study law and overseas will be extremely challenging for him and his family living in a new country and new language, but it will give them a chance to take a breather from what has happened to them in the last several years.

While China may be glad to be rid of Chen for a few years, what will happen after that? Will he be allowed back into China again? Or will he be forced to live in exile and his work in China come to a halt?

Chen will probably clamour to come back, but he will have to be a very good boy in the US and not be too vocal against China. But then again he might not be able to contain himself...

It seems human rights activists in China really need to work alone -- not be associated with anyone or have any loved ones. That way when they are in trouble, their friends and family don't have to be punished too.

Activists are willing to take whatever punishment -- even if it's uncalled for -- but when it comes to affecting their family, it's a really tough call.

Lawyer Gao Zhisheng comes to mind, now languishing in a Xinjiang jail while his family is now struggling to make new lives for themselves in the US.

The Chinese government doesn't mind disarming its critics one by one... it has time on its side...

We shall see how it deals with Chen. But in the meantime we will celebrate this diplomatic solution as a relief to this roller-coaster two weeks.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Fast Losing Faith

I'm now despondent over how the Chen Guangcheng incident has played out.

He is now stuck in a Beijing hospital and denied the ability to contact American diplomats to express his desire for him and his family to leave China.

Apparently he made this decision after he was reunited with them and his wife told him of how she was tied to a chair for two days and threatened to be beaten to death.

Was Chen naive to think the Chinese government would leave him alone? Or was he confused and desperate to see his family to understand what would happen once he left the US consulate?

Now he is a prisoner in the hospital which is surrounded by plain clothed and uniformed police, and the media nor US diplomats are able to go in to see him.

How did this happen? Who dropped the ball?

The US is on the defensive trying to explain they had done all they could for him and that Chen had always steadfastly said he wanted to remain in China.

As for Chinese assurances Chen would be left alone, how could the US expect Beijing to let Chen go about his business after all that he's done to shame the government not only in his work but in the last two weeks?

I'd thought that perhaps Chen's determination to stay in China would be forging a new path for dissidents -- that they could still be able to go about their work in relative freedom.

But perhaps I was naive too.

This is what frustrates and fascinates me about China -- things are constantly unpredictable and hard to read since things are so opaque.

I only hope that through US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's intervention that Chen and his family can somehow get out.

He is scared and stressed. Right now he is losing faith in the US government and that's the last thing Washington needs when it welds so much soft power.

The drama is far from over.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Chen Stands His Ground

A bumper sticker provided by China Aid Association
My prediction yesterday that blind legal activist Chen Guangcheng would have to spend the rest of his life in exile with his family in the United States was completely wrong.

Chen stuck to his guns and the US government complied, but the latter is facing verbal wrath from the Chinese government.

Nevertheless, this afternoon Chen, accompanied by Ambassador Gary Locke, was taken to a Beijing hospital to seek medical treatment and there he was met by his wife and two children, a son and daughter.

After round-the-clock negotiations, China agreed to investigate Chen's claims of local authorities conducting "extralegal activities" of hiring thugs to watch over and beat up the "barefoot lawyer" and his wife, as well as preventing people from seeing him.

Chen has requested that he and his family be moved to another province and that he be allowed to attend university -- currently disabled people are not permitted to go to tertiary institutions. Obviously Chen is keen on furthering his law studies to continue to help the oppressed, which is probably making Beijing nervous.

And to ensure Chen's safety and well-being, American diplomats will be checking on him and his family periodically, as well as seeing the Chinese government follows through on its investigations.

This must have been humiliating for China to accept -- it could not force Chen to leave and the US will be able to monitor how he is treated. Talk about meddling in its internal affairs.

"The US should rethink their policies and practices and take practical actions to maintain the overall relations between China and the United States," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin in a statement issued by Xinhua. "China is a country under the rule of law, and legitimate rights and interests of citizens are protected by constitution and the law. Any citizen has an obligation to abide by the constitution and the law."

May we point out that Chen did not break any laws at all during his law activism; his jailing in 2006 was based on trumped up charges of damaging property and "organizing a mob to disrupt traffic", and not the real reason which was riling up local officials for exposing them forcing women to have abortions and sterilizations.

And what's this about China being "under the rule of law"? How can Liu say that when Chen was under house arrest after he finished doing jail time for crimes he did not commit?

The words are so ridiculous that no one, not even the Chinese themselves believe them anymore.

As a result the US refuses to apologize and have spun it by saying this was a "extraordinary case involving extraordinary circumstances".

In any event it's a very big victory for Chen and his fellow activists, who have gotten much exposure from this incident about the repressed environment they are working in and perhaps feel more free to do their work.

However we shall see if the Chinese government honours its commitments; and if it doesn't, it will surely find another way to choke off human rights activists' efforts which could lead to history repeating itself.