![]() |
| Financial Times' Asia news editor Victor Mallet's visa was not renewed |
The announcement was made by Mallet's employer, the Financial Times of which he is has been the Asia news editor since 2016.
"This is the first time we have encountered this situation in Hong Kong, and we have not been given a reason for the rejection," said a spokeswoman in the London office.
As expected the media industry was outraged by this latest development, starting with the FCC urging the government to let Mallet stay in the city.
| He defended the FCC's right to have Andy Chan speak |
"Hong Kong rightly prides itself on its reputation as a place where the rule of law applies and where freedom of speech is protected by law. The FCC has been proud to represent and champion that reputation since it moved here in 1949.
"In the absence of any reasonable explanation, the FCC calls on the Hong Kong authorities to rescind their decision."
The FCC took a lot of heat for having Hong Kong National Party's Andy Chan Ho-tin speak. Only last week the party was officially, making it illegal for anyone to financially support or aid the party that promoted the city's independence -- at any cost.
Just before the August event at the FCC, Mallet defended the talk as upholding freedom of expression, and that everyone should be allowed to voice their opinions. Days before the talk, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs asked the FCC to call off the lunchtime talk, while the Hong Kong government objected to it.
![]() |
| There was heavy police presence during Chan's talk |
"It has dealt a severe blow to the city's press freedom, and will greatly affect Hong Kong's image," he said. "It is really a big deal. How could the government refuse to renew the visa of a journalist without even offering any reason?"
As expected politicians followed party lines, where pro-Beijing lawmakers said the ban was expected as the FCC had breached the constitution and the law, while pan-Democrats condemned the move as retaliation against the club for inviting Chan to speak.
Legislator Claudia Mo Man-ching said the decision was "very political" and a "bad precedent".
"We are telling the international press that Hong Kong can only accept people who will 'good-mouth' Hong Kong," she said.
Meanwhile Chris Yeung Kin-hing, chairman of the Hong Kong Journalists Association said the government should come clean and explain its decision, as only on mainland China are journalists' visa applications were rejected on political grounds.
![]() |
| Hong Kong's reputation is being threatened by this incident |
Exactly. So which one is it?
Yeung also believes Mallet's case is not an isolated one and that it could result in self-censorship.
Maya Wang, senior researcher on China for Human Rights Watch says, "The Hong Kong authorities' visa renewal rejection -- without explanation -- of a journalist who's done nothing more than his job smacks of Beijing-style persecution of critics.
"Together with the recent and also unprecedented banning of the Hong Kong National Party, the visa rejection indicates a quickening downward spiral for human rights in Hong Kong; that the Hong Kong government is now following Beijing's lead in acting aggressively towards those whose views the authorities dislike."
Mallet applied for his visa renewal last month, but it was not clear when his application was rejected. He is currently outside of Hong Kong and was unavailable for comment.
The only other time another journalist was denied a visa was in 2011 with liberal mainland Chinese commentator Chang Ping.
Is Beijing putting pressure on the Hong Kong government? Or are local authorities wishing to please Beijing?
Either way the optics are bad for Hong Kong and China. The faster they speak up to clear the air, the better.
Hong Kong cannot afford to see its rights and freedoms slowly withering away -- without them the city is not what it stands for anymore.











