![]() |
| Au used to write for Stand News and was charged with sedition |
![]() |
| Around midnight Au was released after 17 hours |
![]() |
| Au's radio show on RTHK was axed last year |
![]() |
| Au used to write for Stand News and was charged with sedition |
![]() |
| Around midnight Au was released after 17 hours |
![]() |
| Au's radio show on RTHK was axed last year |
| A man selling rapid antigen tests on the street |
| Newly-built isolation units for Covid-19 patients |
| Medical personnel at AsiaWorld-Expo |
| Beaches will be closed yet again due to Covid |
| Crowded areas may need vaccine passport to get in, like MTR |
| Transport workers worry of chaos using passport |
| Leave Home Safe app used more often now |
| In Vancouver must show vaccine record to eat out |
| Yuan predicts up to 250,000 infections if no measures taken |
| People need to work from home, close schools |
| ICAC's Peh left Penny's Bay this evening |
| Ho complaining about quarantine situation |
| The Goddess of Democracy is no longer at this spot at CUHK |
| Students held a vigil for the statue this afternoon |
| Staff clean the spot where the statue stood |
| This wall painting was painted over in grey paint |
| In November 2019 students clashed with police at CUHK |
When handing down the sentences to the five at West Kowloon Court, Deputy Judge Kathie Cheung Kit-yee said the defendants must have chosen to remain at the scene either to take part in the violence or abet the criminal acts of their comrades.
She said the lack of evidence over the defendants' level of involvement was no reason to reduce their jail sentences, because all participants in a riot shared the same culpability regardless of their roles in it.
| 5 were arrested at the bridge near CUHK entrance |
Three men aged 23 and one aged 20 were all sentenced to 57 months in jail, while one female defendant, Foo Hoi-ching, 23, was handed a 59-month sentence.
The five were arrested near the bridge near CUHK's entrance where protesters hurled objects at police. At the time protesters had just thrown 23 Molotov cocktails and other hard objects at police.
Foo, a nursing student, remained defiant during mitigation, saying she was not sorry for what she had done and found Cheung's ruling unreasonable.
She wrote a letter to the court that was quickly translated on Twitter by Tsui Lok-man, a former assistant professor at CUHK's School of Journalism and Communication:
| Foo says authorities free to interpret the law |
"In asking for the background report, I honestly have no regrets for my actions, and I also have nothing to say to the judge in my plea, because I do not agree with the law itself, nor do I feel I have done anything wrong.
"Simply put, I do not think this is a reasonable sentence. In the eyes of some people, 'the law is the law, and if you break the law, you need to bear responsibility'.
"Others may also believe that the court's ruling proves that the protesters' behaviour is wrong, and their actions in vain. But I believe that authority does not equal correctness.
"First of all, the laws of Hong Kong today are not recognized by its people, nor does society have any space to discuss whether the law is reasonable or not. Second, the Public Order Ordinance is vague by design, to enable the authorities to freely interpret and control it.
| She says the law controls people, not for justice |
"Under a totalitarian regime, the law is only a bloodless but violent tool of the authorities to control the people, and the court is not a place of justice.
"In such a place, only attention is being paid to social order on a surface level, but the root cause of what is tearing the society apart is ignored.
"When the penalties for political cases gets heavier, some defendants will please guilty or appeal to the judge, in order to reduce their sentence, but this does not necessarily mean they agree that the current law is moral or just.
| Foo no longer believes in the HK judicial system |
"I just want to take this opportunity to express my dissatisfaction. If the court hears what I have said, and believes that it is justified in giving me a heavy sentence to make me regret and reflect, then it will be just as it is."
法官閣下:
首先表明,我無意以這封求情信來博取法官閣下的憐憫。
我索取背景報告時,我坦言對於自己的行為並無後悔,亦沒有說話要向法官閣下求情,因為我並不認同法例本身,亦不覺得自己有做錯的地方。簡單而言,我不認為這是合理的判決。
在某部分人眼中,示威者「犯法就係犯法,就係要負責」,有些人亦可能認為法庭的裁決證明了示威者的行為是錯誤,是徒勞無功的。但我認為,權威並不代表正確。
首先,香港現時的法律,並非由人民共同認可,社會並沒有空間討論現行法律合理與否。其次,暴動條例的定義本來就模糊不清,以便政權靈活解釋和操控。2019年後暴動案件急升,法庭時而重新詮譯暴動定義,令更多行為被列為「法律不認可的行為」,從而令更多人入罪,令政權得以打壓異見者。
極權下的法律只是政權用以規範人民行為的不流血暴力手段,而法庭也不是一個彰顯公義的地方。這裏只會流於表面地關注社會秩序,並不會著眼社會撕裂的根本原因。
當政治案件的刑罰日益加重,有些被告會選擇認罪或向法官求情,以減輕刑期,但或許並不代表他們認同現行法律具有道德正當性。法官閣下可能會指出,若不滿閣下裁決,大可以申請上訴。然而,本人已不再相信香港的司法制度,再高級的法庭亦不見得會聆聽異見者的聲音。
我只是希望藉此機會表達我的不滿。如果法庭聽畢本人以上的言論,認為可以用重判形式令本人從而後悔及反省,那便悉隨尊便。
| CUHK's student union members voted to disband today |
Another group has disbanded after falling afoul with the Hong Kong authorities. The Chinese University of Hong Kong's student union will dissolve eight months after the school's management cut ties with the group, citing possible breaches of the national security law.
| CUHK made it harder for the union to continue |
The moves followed the 12-member union's release of an 80-page manifesto that accused the university of working with police to have students arrested after an attack on campus university guards.
On Thursday on social media, the student union said it sought legal advice that said independent registration was not necessary.
"CUSU sought professional legal opinion and was advised that 'the ordinance does not apply to CUSU' for independent registration. We are now torn between following the legal advice or complying with the university administration's demand," the post said.
| The democratic union shuts down after 50 years |
"[CUSU] has been the only organization mandated to represent the student body on campus. Over the years CUSU has upheld the principles of democratic and federal self-government and co-government for students, and dedicated itself to promoting the common good throughout ever-changing times," the statement read.
"For fifty years CUSU existed as an independent student organization whose representatives were elected through a democratic process. It is a matter of profound regret that CUSU is now history."
| Choy worries about other groups |
"When the front, the alliance and other social organizations closed down one after the other, and many student unions were asked to register independently, I'm not sure whether the universities were making their own decisions, or whether they faced pressure to make the same decision," he said.
"The union was also a platform through which the students' views could be reflected to the university, so its disbandment will affect those consultative processes too."
![]() |
| The Pillar of Shame stands at Haking Wong Podium at HKU |
Danish artist Jens Galschiot created the 8-metre-tall sculpture, which reminds people of the horrific event which must never recur. The sculpture features 50 torn and twisted bodies that symbolize the degradation, devaluation and lack of respect of the individual.
![]() |
| Artist Galschiot created four of these sculptures |
In 1997, the Pillar of Shame was gifted to the Alliance in Support for Democratic Patriotic Movements of China, which is now disbanded, and most recently its assets frozen by the national security police department.
The alliance and its core members are also charged with inciting subversion.
It was the HKU students who fought with university leadership to have the statue on campus, and it was subsequently displayed in other universities including Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
So perhaps it's not surprising university management may be taking advantage of the alliance's disbandment and legal issues to possibly remove the sculpture, though it claims it has reviewed risk management measures and facility usage on campus from time to time, but refused to comment on this possible move.
![]() |
| The sculpture is a reminder of June 4, 1989 |
If the sculpture is removed, it will be another win for Beijing to scrub away another memory of June 4 from Hong Kong.
![]() |
| Donations for the 612 fund was to stop at end of September |
The fund that helped financially support those who were arrested or seriously injured during the 2019 anti-government protests abruptly announced it is immediately ending the collection of donations.
![]() |
| Donations to fund stopped today |
This comes after the national security police announced they were investigating the two organizations and ordered them to hand over information, including details of donors and recipients.
"We are deeply conscious of the impact of this turn of events on current applications, and will do our best to look for all possible solutions and relief," the fund said in a statement on Facebook.
The fund is currently seeking legal advice on whether donations made recently can be refunded.
As of Monday the fund said it has about HK$7.2 million in the bank account.
How people are going to continue without this kind of funding is unclear, but it will be particularly hard for those currently in trial or waiting to go to trial and now the money for legal fees has dried up.
![]() |
| City Forum was lively debate show for 40 years |
Started in 1980, City Forum was a weekly live debate show which invited guests like politicians, academic and opinion leaders to come and discuss topical issues.
The last show was aired on July 18 and talked about the regulation of disposable tableware. It was supposed to start its new season this month.
It had been held every Sunday at Victoria Park or Carpenter Road Park, and in a Wikipedia entry about the show, it says that whenever a pro-democratic politician spoke, pro-Beijing "Victoria Park uncles" would yell outside the forum venue to drown out their voices, or chant, "stray dogs!"
![]() |
| Attendees could directly ask guests questions |
On Sunday, RTHK refused to confirm the decision, saying it was an internal management decision, though critics say the decision seeks to silence dissent.
Meanwhile, the RTHK Programme Staff Union warned that cancelling the show would "severely affect" RTHK's fulfillment of its mission to provide "an open platform for the free exchange of views without fear or favour" as stated in its charter.
Chinese University political scientist Ivan Choy Chi-keung said: "Under the new management, RTHK seems to be trying to avoid critical views being aired in programs so as not to let social harmony be disturbed. The role of the public broadcaster seems to have changed to promoting national identity, patriotism."
He added RTHK owed viewers an explanation of its decision to drop City Forum.
![]() |
| Some claim pro-democracy bias of the show |
But maybe Elizabeth Quat of the pro-establishment Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong has the real reason behind the show's demise: "I don't think the public will lose much without the program. The public is not presented with balanced views on the program. Pro-government guests are usually unfairly treated because the host is biased towards the opposition camp."
So the truth comes out?
The host, So King-hang, refused to comment.
![]() |
| Democratic Party head Lo Kin-hei resigned as district councillor |
Back in November 2019, Hong Kong held its district council elections amid the anti-government protests, and in a landslide, 452 of the 479 directly elected seats were taken by pro-democracy parties. Seventy-one percent of the population cast their votes, an unprecedented turnout in local elections.
However since the national security law was implemented last June and the government has changed the electoral laws, making it a requirement for municipal-level councillors to pledge allegiance and be patriotic before being able to run for office, the situation has changed completely.
![]() |
| The electoral map became almost yellow in 2019 |
Some are in jail awaiting to face charges for taking part in the primaries that were held last July.
With Lo resigning, it doesn't look like Hong Kong's largest traditional pro-democracy party will take part in the upcoming Legislative Council elections in September.
Lo, the party's youngest ever leader, apologized to his constituency for failing to complete his four-year term and explained his concerns for the new requirements to prove one's "patriotism".
"That kind of uncertainty is a major constraint for me to carry out my community work... I don't want to keep on being threatened for a very long time," he said.
"I don't know when there will be other reasons to deal with district councillors. I think [resigning] is a clearer way to head into the future."
Under a new oath-taking law aimed at removing "unpatriotic"office-holders that took effect in May, authorities have the power to unseat councillors if their pledges were deemed invalid.
![]() |
| What will this year's election look like? |
Ivan Choy Chi-keung, senior lecturer at Chinese University's department of government and public administration, said he was "not optimistic" the Democratic Party would run in September's polls.
"I think several months ago, there was still such a possibility. But in these few months, the situation has become worse and worse because of the closing of Apple Daily, the arrest of additional members of the democratic camp and also because of the [disqualification] issue," he said.
"The overall political atmosphere is not positive for them to pass a resolution to participate in the future Legislative Council elections."
Choy believes Beijing still wants to have some "so-called democrats" to run to give the appearance of a fair election, and some may take that opportunity to run, which may cause a split in the party.
Anything can happen between now and September...
![]() |
| The dystopian film Ten Years would be banned |
The Hong Kong government has now focused its attention on censoring movies because of the national security law just to make things even worse for the local film industry.
Under the Film Censorship Ordinance, public screening of films will not be allowed if they are found to be "endorsing, supporting, promoting, glorifying or inciting" acts of subversion, secession, terrorism, or collusion with foreign forces.
![]() |
| This documentary was nominated for an Oscar |
The latest move would ban films like this as well as documentaries like the Oscar-nominated Do Not Split and Inside the Red Brick Wall that covered the 2019 anti-government protests would never be allowed to be shown in Hong Kong.
This kind of censorship was seen earlier with M+, the contemporary art museum due to open at the end of this year was under pressure to now show work deemed anti-China.
Apparently films will be censored by a panel of 40 people appointed by the chief executive. They will review the films and then classify them based on depictions of sex, violence, crime, or any insult to race or religion, among other concerns.
![]() |
| Ai Weiwei's political art puts pressure on M+ |
The censorship guidelines are developed by the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau.
While Tenky Tin Kai-man, chairman of the Federation of Hong Kong Filmmakers says movie professionals will need to seek clarification of the guidelines by the authorities, he said filmmakers would make sure they are not crossing any red lines if they wanted their movies to be shown across the border.
Crucindo Hung Cho-sing, chairman of the Hong Kong Motion Picture Industry Association, said it would be in the best interests of filmmakers to not touch sensitive topics as their livelihoods are at stake.
"But I believe filmmakers in our association aim to make money. They definitely won't make movies endangering national security," he said.
![]() |
| This protest documentary will also be censored |
She worries this latest censorship salvo will further weaken the local film industry.
"Hong Kong movies are already dying. With this, it will worsen their challenges," she said.
Leung noted some local movies carried more critical perspectives than mainland ones.
"Now they will be the same," she said.
![]() |
| At least 64 new Covid cases are related to Ursus Fitness |
Today the city logged a staggering 60 cases, following an outbreak at a gym in Sai Ying Pun. Ursus Fitness is popular with bankers and lawyers, which resulted in many firms and banks closing their offices because of positive cases, while the trainers there work in different gyms around the city.
![]() |
| Dr Chuang hopes gym outbreak can be controlled |
However, health officials are hesitant to call this growing spate of cases Hong Kong's fifth wave.
"I do not wish to see a fifth wave," said Dr Chuang Shuk-kwan, of the Centre for Health Protection. "I hope it can be controlled, but it has been spreading very fast. One infection has already led to many others."
Indeed. At least 12 other fitness centres were visited by Covid carriers, including in Taikoo Place and Central.
As a result there are now infections recorded in companies like HSBC, China Construction Bank, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, law firm Allen & Overy, while some Citibank employees who went to the affected gyms were told to work from home.
In addition, at least 14 schools, including international ones have also been affected by cases or taking precautionary measures, such as British Kellet School, French International School, and South Island School.
![]() |
| Hui says the gym could be super spreader cluster |
"I worry the big outbreak at the fitness centre will be the prelude to the fifth wave, but the Centre for Health Protection very quickly quarantined close contacts," Hui told a radio program. "Hopefully that will stop the virus from spreading everywhere in the community. We will need to closely monitor the situation."
He was also concerned the gym could be a "super-spreader cluster" and urged an examination of the ventilation system and check how it is cleaned.
Meanwhile the interest in getting a vaccine has dropped after four people died after getting the Sinovac jab. They also had preexisting health issues, which led to many with high blood pressure and/or diabetes to not get the vaccine.
![]() |
| Many worried about side effects cancelled jabs |
But for many, the lack of trust in the government has meant people are left fending for themselves and want to make the right choice when it comes to vaccines. They also worry about side effects since the vaccines were developed so quickly without enough long-term data.
Nevertheless, health experts have told the public that getting a jab is better than none at all, but many are waiting to see how others react to it.
Another friend got the jab today. He said there was no line at 9am and it was very efficient.
At least Hong Kong has that right.
![]() |
| The numbers of students graduating are decreasing |
If one needs another sign that Hong Kong's young people are leaving the city, look no further than the university statistics. They show more than 2,100 students dropped out of eight local universities in the 2019-20 year, up 15 percent from 2018-19.
It's the highest number of dropouts since 2004 when this data was first recorded.
![]() |
| Chinese University was damaged from clashes |
While most universities cited personal and family issues as the reasons for withdrawals, student leaders said their peers left to study abroad following the anti-government protests in 2019.
There are other surveys showing students in primary and secondary schools dropping out over the past year, including from elite institutions, which indicates they most probably left Hong Kong.
In the 2019-20 academic year, 2,120 undergraduate and postgraduate students withdrew from the city's eight publicly-funded universities, up 15 percent from 1,848 in 2018-19, according to statistics from the grants committee.
While City University and Education University did not see an uptick in dropouts, Polytechnic University saw the biggest drop at 505 students leaving, 40 percent more than the 359 who quit the previous year.
![]() |
| HKU saw a low number of students drop out |
The numbers include local and non-local students.
Poly U and Chinese University sustained the most damage during the 2019 protests when protesters occupied the campuses and had clashes with police.
Edy Jeh Tsz-lam, a student representative of HKU's governing council and former president of the student union, said she believed some dropouts could be non-local students who returned to their home countries because of the coronavirus pandemic, while local students left Hong Kong to study elsewhere.
She heard of students transferring to universities in Taiwan and the UK, while others had quit university to reapply to study other subjects because their personal goals had changed.
"For instance, a friend of mine who was studying law told me [during the 2019 protests] that she was considering quitting university and reapplying for dentistry, as she believed studying law and [entering the legal sector] in Hong Kong was no longer meaningful," Jeh said, citing critics who had declining confidence in the local judicial system.
![]() |
| CUHK saw 13 percent increase in withdrawals |
However officially, Baptist, Polytechnic, Education and Lingnan universities cited personal reasons for why students withdrew, while a Chinese University spokeswoman said students transferring to another local institution or overseas universities was also a major factor.
The dropout figures for 2019-20 were the highest since the 2003-04 academic year, the earliest for which the grants committee data was immediately available. That year about 1,704 students withdrew, while in the 2010-11 year saw the lowest number of students dropout at 1,057. It has hovered around the 1,800 a year since 2015.
But the most recent figures are troubling, and professor Lau Chi-pang of Lingnan University's associate vice-president of academic affairs and external relations says more studies should be conducted to find out the real reasons why students have quit.
![]() |
| Poly U saw biggest drop in students leaving |
Lau is right and the government should be worried that a stream of students are leaving or have changed their majors. Are we going to see fewer studying law as Jeh suggested, or even history now that national education will change how the subject is taught in schools?
Hong Kong's political and social environment continues to deterioriate daily, and the numbers of students leaving are a big red flag.