 |
| Andy Chan argues why Hong Kong should separate from China at the FCC |
Hong Kong National Party convenor Andy Chan Ho-tin knew he would be the centre of attention today, giving a talk at the Foreign Correspondents Club and so he got himself into the building in Central hours before it started at 1pm.
In previous interviews he spoke in Cantonese, but this being the FCC the 27-year-old spoke with a slight British accent and his English was pretty good. He was also dressed in a suit to show he should be taken seriously by the much older adults in the room.
I caught the last half of his appearance on Facebook Live and he was composed, answering questions from the audience, mostly made up of journalists. He called China an "empire" and that Hong Kong being independent was the only way it could achieve democracy.
 |
| Chan leaves the FCC with police protection |
During the Occupy protests in 2014, he explained he was not political at all, only concerned about his career after graduation. However the failure of the Umbrella Movement made him come to the conclusion that it wasn't the Hong Kong government that would grant the city democracy, but the Chinese government.
Hence the need for the city to separate from China and grant itself democracy.
However most people have problems with the part where he said they will use violence if necessary...
Nevertheless, Chan remained unflappable during his FCC talk and the question and answer period after, where the shouts of protesters -- those against him and those for protecting freedom of speech -- were heard inside the room.
"Time and again, our government has shown that whatever 'freedom' and 'democracy' they claim to be upholding are communist mirages," he said. Chan gave examples of the government's bid to stop him from running in the Legislative Council elections in 2016, the ban of the HKNP from registering as a company, and the police proposal to ban his party altogether.
He accused China of reneging on its promise in the Sino-British Joint Declaration that guarantees the "one country, two systems" guiding principle for Hong Kong, declaring the mainland "by its nature as an empire, a threat to all free peoples in the world".
 |
| There were protesters against Chan and his platform... |
Chan added Hong Kong was suffering "national cleansing" thanks to the one-way permit scheme that allows 150 mainlanders to settle in the city each day.
"Local communities were shattered, because of the rapid influx of an incompatible culture... our very living space is taken from us," he said.
"Even our language, the words that shape our thoughts, are being demonized. Per China's orders, Hong Kong's future generations will now abandon Cantonese and switch entirely to Mandarin."
He is speaking out what many are thinking, which is very daring. Chan seems to be very aware of the consequences and continues to stick his neck out even though he is followed everyday and his family is harassed by people when they are at home.
As expected, the Chinese and Hong Kong governments condemned Chan for his speech and the FCC for giving him the platform to speak, even though the latter stressed the event was an exercise in free speech.
Beijing's Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong released a strongly worded statement.
 |
| ...And there were those supporting freedom of speech |
"FCC has already made its stance when it decided whom to invite for a talk. It would be hypocritical or fooling oneself to insist with sophistry that it does not hold a stance after doing something wrong," the statement read.
"We urge the FCC to reflect on itself and right the wrong, and follow the Chinese and SAR laws with its actions... any words and actions which attempt to break Hong Kong away from China would be punished, and no Chinese citizen would agree with anyone or group which backs the Hong Kong separatists."
The Hong Kong government was not as fiery in its tone:
"Providing a public platform for a speaker to openly advocate independence completely disregards Hong Kong's constitutional duty to uphold national sovereignty. It is totally unacceptable and deeply regrettable," it said.
Well... it was China who made such a big deal about it in the first place that led us to where we are today. If it had not called attention to his speaking engagement, then the whole event would have come and gone with hardly anyone noticing.
But Chan's talk turned into a referendum on freedom of speech and he willingly took the spotlight.
Now his party has to submit its defense to the police on September 4 in the hopes of avoiding a ban.
This talk has probably put another black mark against him, but Chan seems undeterred.