Why We Remember June Fourth

The growing protests in Tiananmen Square calling for democracy in 1989

This coming Tuesday will be the most sensitive anniversary the Chinese government will try to avoid this year, but it's inevitable.

It will be 30 years since the horrible bloody crackdown in Tiananmen Square and those of us outside China cannot forget.

Here is an essay by Professor Emeritus of East Asian Studies at Princeton University Perry Link called Why We Remember June Fourth:

Some people recently asked, “Why must you remember June Fourth? Thirty years have gone by. It is history. Get over it. Move on.”
A simple question, but there are many answers. No single answer is adequate, and all of the answers together still leave the question hanging in mid-air, asking for more.

We remember June Fourth because Jiang Jielan was 17 at the time. He is still 17. He will always be 17. People who die do not age.

Liu Xiaobo talking to the students in the square

We remember June Fourth because the lost souls that haunted Liu Xiaobo until he died will haunt us, too, until we do.

We remember June Fourth because the glint of bonfires on bayonets is something one does not forget, even if one did not see it personally.

We remember June Fourth because it taught us the essential nature of the Communist Party of China when all of the clothes, every shred, falls away. No book, film, or museum could be clearer.

We remember June Fourth because of the ordinary workers who died then. We cannot remember most of their names because we do not know most of their names. We never did. But we remember them as people, and we remember that we never knew their names.

We remember June Fourth because the worst of China is there—but the best of China is there, too.

We remember June Fourth because it was a massacre—not just a crackdown, or an “incident,” an event, a shijian, a fengbo; not a counterrevolutionary riot, not a faint memory, and not, as a child in China might think today, a blank. It was a massacre.

Fang Lizhi influenced some student leaders of Tiananmen

We remember June Fourth because, as Fang Lizhi noted with his characteristic wit, it is the only case he has heard of in which a nation invaded itself.

We remember June Fourth because Xi Jinping’s fat smile is a mask.

We remember June Fourth because we want to know what the soldiers who did the killing remember. They were brainwashed on the outskirts of the city before they carried out their deadly orders. So they were victims, too. We do not know what their thoughts were. But we remember that we want to know.

We remember June Fourth because Ding Zilin is still alive. She is 82 years old. When she goes out, plainclothes police follow to provide security. Security for her? No, security for the state. That’s right, a regime with 100 trillion yuan in GDP and two million soldiers needs protection from an 82-year-old lady. Protection from her ideas. This is worth remembering.

We remember June Fourth in order to support others who remember. We remember alone. But we remember together, too.

Ding Zilin with her son Jiang Jielan's portrait at 17 years old

We remember June Fourth because remembering it makes us better people. Remembering is in our personal interests. When politicians talk about “interests,” they mean material interests. But moral interests are just as important—no, they are more important. More important than owning a yacht.

We remember June Fourth because it was an historic turning point for one-fifth of the world. A turning point in a frightening direction. We hope it won’t be so much of a turning point as to throw the whole world into a ditch. But we don’t know. We’ll have to see.

We remember June Fourth because, if we didn’t remember it, it could not be in our heads any other way. Could we possibly have imagined it? No.

We remember June Fourth because there are people who dearly want us to remember. It comforts them to know that we remember.

We remember June Fourth because there are also people who desperately want us not to remember. They want us to forget because forgetting helps to preserve their political power. How foul! We would oppose that power even if remembering massacres were the only way to do it.

An empty Tiananmen Square at the 20th anniversary in 2009

We remember June Fourth in order to remind ourselves of the way the Chinese government lies to itself and to others. It says the Chinese people have long since made their “correct judgment on the 1989 counterrevolutionary riot at Tiananmen Square.” But each year, at June Fourth, plainclothes police block people from entering the Square. Why? If the Chinese people all believe what the government says they believe, then why not let them into the square to denounce the counterrevolutionaries? The presence of the police shows that the regime does not believe its own lies.

We remember June Fourth because regime change would be very good for China. People are afraid of the two words “regime change” because of George Bush’s disastrous miscalculation in Iraq. But we should not blame the words themselves for Bush’s mistake. Liu Xiaobo used the words. Peaceful attainment of regime change was his main goal.

We remember June Fourth because shocks to the human brain last a long time. We would not be able to forget even if we tried.

Another Think Tank... on Democracy

Tiananmen student leader Wang Dan starts a new think tank on democracy

Tomorrow, the 29th anniversary of the June 4th crackdown, one of the student leaders, Wang Dan will launch his think tank in the United States.

It's called Dialogue China and its aim is to advocate democracy in China. One of the council members will be Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong Chi-fung. Others include former student leaders Wu'er Kaixi, Xiang Xiaoji, Wang Juntao and Su Xiaokang, along with American democracy expert Larry Diamond, veteran sinologist Perry Link, and Lin Fei-fan, leader of Taiwan's Sunflower Movement.

Joshua Wong is a council member of the think tank

"Facing the increasing suppression from the Chinese regime, we always believe a better connection with civil society and the international community would be important to push for Hong Kong's democracy," Wong, co-founder of Demosisto said.

While Beijing has warned of consequences of Hong Kong and Taiwan calling for independence, Wong isn't concerned. "Beijing has already been suppressing us. We are not worried at all."

However, he is currently on bail pending an appeal and faces travel restrictions. As a result, Jeffrey Ngo, a standing committee member of Demosisto, will speak on his behalf at Monday's seminar, titled "China's Threat to Global Freedom and Democracy".

Perry Link, co-author of the Tiananmen Papers is a member

In January, Wong was jailed for contempt of court for his part in the 2014 Occupy protests.

While being affiliated with this think tank may put Wong on more dangerous ground with Beijing, democracy is something he is passionate about and may spur him on to think of alternatives. There are some highly regarded people in this think tank and so Wong is in good company.