 |
| The mangled taxi after a coach plowed into it in Tsing Yi last Friday |
In the early hours of last Friday morning, November 30, there was a fatal accident on the Cheung Tsing Highway in Tsing Yi that killed six people and injured 31.
A taxi had stopped on the side of the highway with its hazard lights on when moments later a coach carrying airport staff to work, crashed into it.
It turns out the 62-year-old driver, Fok Chi-sum, had been involved in a staggering seven other incidents of careless driving and speeding, including an accident (with no casualties) weeks before this fatal crash. Fok succumbed to his injuries on Tuesday.
 |
| The coach driver had been working long hours before the crash |
Apart from his poor driving record, he had also been working long 12-hour shifts without a proper four-hour rest in between shifts.
Why is it that people who do what are considered lowly-paid jobs have the most dangerous ones that can affect people's lives?
In any event, there are calls for coaches to have seat belts installed in them, but already operators have rebuffed the suggestion, saying it's too costly.
Tang Chi-keung, vice-chairman of the Public Omnibus Operators Association, said industry representatives had agreed at a meeting with the government to install seat belts on new coaches, but not existing ones.
"It's not as easy as just installing the belts. You need to tear up the flooring, replace the seats and then run safety tests," he said after the meeting.
"Doing so on an old vehicle could cost you HK$300,000 (US$38,382). The vehicle itself may only be worth some HK$100,000 to HK$200,000. It's not worth it."
 |
| Calls for retrofitting seat belts on coaches has been nixed |
On new coaches, the coast would still be about HK$150,000," Tang added and that of the 7,000 coaches in Hong Kong, about half already had seat belts.
So cost trumps lives? Tell that to the grieving families of the victims of last week's crash. They were innocent victims who were only their way to work. It turns out four people, including the driver were thrown out of the coach -- were they wearing seat belts?
Passengers should have the choice to wear seat belts or not -- and so they should be provided in the coaches. Coach operators are working on very thin margins, but at the same time seat belts are an investment, not a liability.
For almost eight years I took a coach to work in the New Territories every morning and I made sure I was strapped in. However, there were sometimes where there were no seat belts or the ones provided were faulty or didn't seem secure. This is not acceptable.
Perhaps even worse is that the Hong Kong government is agreeing with the coach operators to not retro-fit old coaches with seat belts. How can that be? Is the government kowtowing to these coach operators for fear of not getting their support, like the taxi associations?
Even transport minister Frank Chan Fan said today 111 people had been killed in traffic accidents in the first 10 months of this year, up from 86 in the same period last year -- a jump of almost 30 percent.
Surely safety is more important than cost?